Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Outsource Staffing to Meet Your Increasing Business Needs ...

BY MICHELLE BARKLEY

Outsource staffing is an effort made by outsourcing companies to provide you and your company with just the perfect employee capable of doing your work to help you run your business smoothly and perfectly. To run any organization successfully and efficiently it is very important to choose the right people who can do the required work. Well it is correctly said that a company or an organization is as good as its people. So choosing the man power who will work for a company is as crucial as selecting any other major component of a business. Business owners must make an extra effort to select the best people to work for them.

On the whole staffing process, that is selecting the right staff and training them to do the work for a business is a time consuming and exhaustive process. Outsource staffing is a simple means for you to be free from all staffing worries. It requires a lot of effort, time, planning and other resources for an organization to go about hiring the best staffing services. Outsourcing staff is the best and the most viable option for any firm to select and hire the services of the best people to work for them.

One of the main benefits of outsource staffing is that you can save lots of money, time and other resources. Most businesses and companies have many time consuming and complicated jobs to take care of for running their business successfully. So in such a scenario outsourcing staff becomes the best option. You can also save huge amounts of money if you outsource staff from outsourcing companies. The cost of labor in developing countries is very low and when professionals do the outsourcing work from developing countries, the work can actually be done at a much lower rate.

Once you have outsourced the staff of your business you can also have lots of time at your disposal. This becomes possible as outsourcing lets you free up your valuable time. The professionals who have freed up from the workload can deal with other important business deals. Also all the other important sectors of your business can be dealt with as the internal staff can be freed up.

One thing that has been noticed in most businesses is the fact that professionals switch jobs very frequently. This has a very negative effect on any business. After a professional has been hired and trained to do particular types of work, they leave the organization. This means the loss of time money and all the other resources that was used for training the professional to work according to company standards. So the next time you want to hire new professionals think about all these aspects and you can find outsourcing staff to be a better option for your business.

Whether to outsource staff or not is entirely your decision and no one can force you to decide on anything. So before you actually go about outsource staffing you must find out if this will benefit your business or not. After you have undertaken the process for your business, at anytime you find that you are not satisfied with the work done, you can simply take back the work and let someone else do the thing for you. There are plenty of outsourcing companies from which you can hire the outsourcing services.

?

http://www.ArticleGeek.com - Free Website Content

Source: http://womantowomanmagazine.com/xn/detail/3075250%3ABlogPost%3A120092

who do you think you are superpac steve appleton bishop eddie long madonna give me all your luvin video roseanne barr president green party

galacticterrarium: Animal Collective -Today?s Supernatural

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://fatfook.tumblr.com/post/28319892614

snooty fox el debarge portland weather clintonville battlestar galactica blood and chrome my morning jacket roger goodell

U.S. Senate runoff in Texas tomorrow

We had a good discussion in our staff meeting today about how best to plan our live election night editorial re the runoff for the U.S. Senate GOP nomination. We typically don?t get returns until a couple of hours after the polls close, maybe by 9 p.m., and then have to race the clock to write a smart editorial by about 10 p.m. or 11 p.m. that will stand up for readers in the morning.

It often makes sense to sketch out an editorial based on what you THINK will happen well before the polls close and then just have to update/polish it in the hours before deadline. Of course, if you ?guess? wrong, you have to be ready to do a complete write-thru on deadline.

So we?ve ?picked a side? with regard to guessing who will win and are planning to write accordingly. A small election team ? Mike Hashimoto, Bill McKenzie and I ? will be working election night to make any adjustments/pivots necessary to that draft?.

With all that in mind, it?s often interesting to read what outsiders think of the dynamics at play in this top-of-the-ticket runoff races. Here?s just one example, from one of my favorite publications, National Journal. Can?t say that I disagree with much of what Kevin Brennan writes, including his top four indicators to watch?..

?

This entry was posted in Keven Ann Willey and tagged Cruz, Dewhust, Senate by Keven Ann Willey/Editor. Bookmark the permalink.

Source: http://dallasmorningviewsblog.dallasnews.com/2012/07/18906.html/

sherry arnold snooty fox el debarge portland weather clintonville battlestar galactica blood and chrome my morning jacket

Monday, July 30, 2012

Will lack of Penn State 'death penalty' uncover more NCAA issues?

Welcome back after the off-season from hell.

Penn State's torturous timeline, spanning from last November to last week, cast a pall over the sport that could have hardly been fathomed this time last year.

Jerry Sandusky's pathetic mug shot, the Freeh Report, Joe Paterno's eradicated legacy and NCAA President Mark Emmert's recitation Monday of unprecedented sanctions have left a football nation dazed and confused.

"In one form or fashion it has affected us," Commissioner Jim Delany said in his opening statements this week at Big Ten media days.

The Aug. 30 opening bell can't get here soon enough as we eagerly anticipate the return to trivial pursuits. Before we move on, though, we reflect.

What happened here? What happens now?

The lasting take-away of Penn State is biblically obvious: the consolidation of power in the hands of a few, over time, is poisonous.

Lord Acton, the historian and moralist, opined in another century: "Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely."

Acton's next line, not as often repeated, is "great men are almost always bad men."

Nowhere is it easier for power to corrupt than in the upstairs office of a powerful football coach. The thirst for victory, combined with money, combined with alma mater mania, has elevated conquering coaches to kings.

The reason Penn State's insular circle thought they could conceal secrets and handle problems internally is because they always had.

Paterno's avuncular "JoePa" public persona, philanthropy and win-loss record provided cover for more ruthless, pragmatic, day-to-day operations.

Power corrupted at incomparable levels at Penn State, but it also corrupted Jim Tressel at Ohio State, and maybe Pete Carroll at USC.

"No one program, no one person, no matter how popular, no matter how successful, can be allowed to derail the soul of an institution," Commissioner Mike Slive said at the Southeastern Conference's recent media days.

No one would disagree, yet some would also note a school in his king-maker conference, Alabama, practices the custom of erecting a statue of each coach who has won a national football championship.

Nick Saban, two-time Bowl Championship Series winner in Tuscaloosa, walks by his bust every day on the way to work.

A good rule of thumb is to never build a statue of anyone living, and rarely of anyone dead.

Someone recently suggested to Saban that the football coach at Alabama, dating to Bear Bryant, had potentially dangerous power.

"Well, you know, it's not true if that's the perception," Saban said.

Source: http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-0729-penn-state-dufresne-20120729,0,5346331.column?track=rss

lenny dykstra the voice jenelle evans jenelle evans mlb 12 the show sabu google play

Find Your Passion | Balance Personal Training

Posted in July 30, 2012 ? 11:19 AMh.Eric Foxman

How motivated are you by your health and fitness goals? Are they inspiring you to get off the couch? Do you feel fired up to go to the gym? Losing weight for your cousin?s up-coming wedding or dropping four pants sizes are good goals, but are you passionate about them? So often people will say ?Eric, I went to the gym 3 times this week.? That?s great. Was it productive? Did you enjoy it? Is it moving you closer toward your goal? Or did you go just so you could mark it off your list?

This brings us back to the basics of goal setting. Bigger than your health and fitness goal is the WHY of your goal. Like you, I have trained hard and cleaned up my diet for upcoming trips, 5k runs, weddings, etc. Those are good motivators and have helped me to stay focused and get in better shape, but what?s the bigger picture? After you get healthy and fit what are you going to DO with that healthy and fit body? Try a new sport? Maybe teach somebody else how you achieved your goal(s)? If this is getting under your skin, that?s good.

Be passionate about using your body. Test yourself. Enjoy the competition, whether it?s with yourself or with others. Remember, it?s not all about the goal, it?s about striving, aiming and reaching for your goal. It?s the journey, the experience.

In previous posts, I?ve talked about my oldest brother, Ken. He is built like a linebacker, lifts weights like a powerlifter, but also plays doubles tennis. Confused? He definitely breaks the mould. His zest for life is infectious. When we spend time together or talk on the phone I always enjoy hearing about a recent tennis match or weight lifting accomplishment.

If you want to see passion firsthand, I strongly encourage you to watch the London Olympics. The athletes definitely bring the Olympic Creed to life. ?The most important thing is not to win but to take part, just as the most important thing in life is not the triumph but the struggle. The essential thing is not to have conquered but to have fought well.?

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Source: http://www.balancepersonaltraining.com/2012/07/30/find-your-passion/

rachel crow steelers browns va tech dan gilbert david stern david stern julian beever

Sunday, July 29, 2012

Webinar - St. Joe's Workshop

by KHouseman on July 29, 2012

Webinars added: LinkedIn 101 and 201 for Business Professionals ? Sept. and Nov. 2012

Hello, We?ve added ?LinkedIn 101 and LinkedIn 201 for Business Professionals? webinars through Walsh College and would like to invite you to register now to save your place. If you register, we?ll send reminders as the event dates approach

LinkedIn 101 for Business Professionals

Thursday, September 27, 2012

12:15 ? 1 p.m. E.T.

Registration required: www.walshcollege.edu/Webinars.

Free, but dial-in charges may apply if you are not able to listen to sound via your PC

LinkedIn is the #1 professional networking site for business professionals. If you?re just getting started on LinkedIn and need some help ? or if you?re on LinkedIn but not sure if you?re using the site the right way, this session is for you.

? An overview of LinkedIn: What is it? How is it different from other social media and job search sites? How can you use it as a job seeker, working professional, marketer, or recruiter?

? LinkedIn etiquette, tips to expand your network, techniques to highlight your expertise, and more

? How Walsh Career Services can help you with your candidate or job search

? Q&A from webinar attendees

LinkedIn 201 for Business Professionals

Thursday, November 15, 2012

12:15 ? 1 p.m. E.T.

Registration required: www.walshcollege.edu/Webinars.

Free, but dial-in charges may apply if you are not able to listen to sound via your PC

This session is designed for LinkedIn users who have established accounts and are looking to further expand and supercharge your profile and networking efforts. This session will take you beyond the basics to help you further extend your network and tap into the power of LinkedIn.

RECOMMENDED CRITERIA (suggested, but not required to attend)

o 20+ connections

o Profile: 75%+ complete

o 1+ recommendations on your profile

o Familiar with ?Answers? section of LinkedIn

o Member of 5+ groups

o Regularly post and read status updates

Webinar Content:

- Creative, powerful techniques: Recommendations, answers, groups and status updates

- Secrets LinkedIn won?t tell you ? but will help you with networking and your LinkedIn efforts

- Profile do?s and don?ts ? and why

- Plus: A brief overview of Walsh Career Services for students, alumni, and employers

- Q&A from webinar attendees

Featured Presenters

Brenda Meller is the Marketing Director for Walsh College and experienced in using social media for job search and networking. Her social media focus is mainly on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter.

Cheryl Carr is an outreach coordinator / advisor through the Walsh College Career Services office, which assists students and alumni. Cheryl is experienced with job search assistance, practice interviews, and general career consultation. She also works with local businesses to help them recruit new employees from the qualified pool of Walsh students and graduates.

Brenda Meller

Director of Marketing

Walsh College

3838 Livernois Road

Troy, MI 48083

ph: 248.823.1205

fax: 248.823.1040

bmeller@walshcollege.edu

Source: http://www.stjoesworkshop.com/webinar-2/

doug fister rick warren the perfect storm hard boiled eggs sound of music mickelson how to tie a tie

Smoking Tied to Risk for Hepatitis Return After Liver Transplant

FRIDAY, July 27 (HealthDay News) -- Current or previous smoking may increase the risk of hepatitis reinfection in people who have a liver transplant due to viral hepatitis, a new study suggests.

This may be because tobacco in cigarettes lowers their immune system response, according to Dr. Mamatha Bhat, of McGill University in Montreal, and colleagues.

For the study, the investigators analyzed data from 444 transplants conducted at the McGill University Health Center between 1990 and 2004.

They found that the average "viral hepatitis-free survival time" was less than one year for smokers and more than four years for nonsmokers.

The study was published in the July issue of the journal Liver Transplantation.

"Our findings suggest that recurrence of viral hepatitis may be more frequent among liver transplant recipients who are active or former smokers," Bhat said in a journal news release. Encouraging patients to quit smoking after their transplant may improve their outcomes, she added.

The study results do not mean that smokers should be denied liver transplants, but suggest that doctors need to be more vigilant in monitoring for complications in patients who smoke.

"Organs available for transplantation are scarce, with livers particularly in short supply," Bhat said. "Transplant centers need to take an active role in identifying and minimizing risks to the success of liver transplantation."

While the study uncovered an association between smoking and the recurrence of viral hepatitis in liver transplant patients, it did not prove a cause-and-effect relationship.

More information

The American Liver Foundation has more about liver transplantation.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/smoking-tied-risk-hepatitis-return-liver-transplant-180417331.html

colton harris moore hurd hurd christopher hitchens ron paul 2012 zynga stock zynga stock

It's All About Borrowers With Bad Credit Debt Consolidation ...

Irritating and distressing these are two of the many adjectives with which we can describe the lives of people with bad credit history. As there is so much that a person may loose out on with bad credit profile that sometimes life does indeed looks that way.

For the benefit of people, who do not know, bad credit history is a type of title that a person carries if he fails to meet the repayment schedule set out by the creditor. This makes getting loans tougher and if the loans are approved they are approved at higher rates of interest, this is because of the risk factor that the borrower is likely to bear because of the reputation of the borrower of the loans.

?Needs must? as the saying goes, i.e. if there is a need and we can?t just let it get away, this may require a borrower to take a loan or as the case may be multiple loans. But, people fail to realize that getting a loan is easier than returning it. To cater to this part of the whole loan borrowing process, the borrowers should give thought to taking of the bad credit debt consolidation.

Bad credit debt consolidation loan is a loan which seeks to help borrowers with bad credit histories that have multiple debts against their name, the process of debt consolidation involves the borrowers applying for another loan which would clear off all the debts that are already accumulated and from then on the borrower will focus on that loan only.

Many people get baffled as to why we need yet another loan when we are already struggling with so many of them. What they fail to see are the benefits of bad credit debt consolidation. With bad credit debt consolidation there is more to achieve for the borrowers than what initially meets the eye. The benefits of bad credit debt consolidation that a person can look forward to are:

? The loan will carry a lower rate of interest than the average interest rate of previous debts.

? It is much easier to pay to a single lender than a number of creditors.

? Borrowers get other benefits regarding the loan from their professional creditors.

? The loan allows the borrower to improve on his credit score by following the guidelines given by the lender in regards to the loan and this will help him in long term.

Apart from that there can be other benefits that the borrower can get depending upon his profile and credit circumstances.

It is advisable that if things are not going to plan than rather than letting things petering out, it is better to try something which is worthwhile and something that would help. Bad credit debt consolidation is certainly one of them. So, if you believe in advises, this as far as advises go could be one of the best that a borrower gets. So, do not wait and apply for the bad credit debt consolidation.

Alex Jonnes is associated with Easy Debt Consolidations. He is Masters in Business Administration and writes on various finance related topics. To find Debt consolidation loan bad credit, bad credit debt consolidation, low interest debt consolidation loan visit http://www.easy-debt-consolidations.co.uk

Written By : Alex Jonnes

Source: http://www.yodzian.com/html/content/it-sq-s-all-about-borrowers-with-bad-credit-debt-consolidation/

billy graham scion fr s elf on a shelf elf on a shelf carrier iq carrier iq linda perry

Journal Communications Reports Positive Q2 - RADIO ONLINE ...

RADIO ONLINE

Journal Communications Reports Positive Q2

Journal Communications, Inc. today announced results for its second quarter ended June 24, 2012. "Journal Communications had a strong second quarter with operating earnings up 17% driven by political and issue advertising and a continuing recovery in many of our local broadcast markets," said Steven Smith, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Journal Communications. "We continued to pursue our JS Everywhere strategy, launching a new Milwaukee Journal Sentinel iPad app in May. We were pleased to close on the purchase of our two new radio stations at the beginning of the third quarter for $11.7 million, creating a strong cluster in Tulsa Oklahoma. While we expect to continue to actively pursue growth opportunities in broadcast, we also expect to use our cash to pay debt and repurchase shares." For the second quarter, revenue of $95.5 million increased 6.0% compared to $90.1 million. Operating earnings of $13.5 million increased 17.1% compared to $11.5 million. Net earnings were $7.6 million compared to $6.1 million. Second Quarter 2012 compared to Second Quarter 2011
  • Revenue of $95.5 million, up 6.0%
  • Broadcast revenue up 18.4% or 16.5% excluding revenue from the new Tulsa station local marketing agreement
  • Broadcast TV revenue up 22.5% or 7.1% excluding political and issue advertising revenue
  • Operating earnings of $13.5 million, up 17.1%
  • Diluted EPS of $0.13 or $0.14 excluding a $1.0 million pre-tax publishing workforce reduction charge, up from $0.10
  • Notes payable to banks of $21.4 million, a reduction of $19.9 million from year end 2011
  • Repurchased 132,589 class A shares for $0.6 million
  • Milwaukee Journal Sentinel launched new iPad app
In the second quarter, basic and diluted net earnings per share of class A and B common stock were $0.13, or $0.14 excluding a $1.0 million pre-tax publishing workforce reduction charge, compared to $0.10. The operating margin was 14.1% for the second quarter compared to 12.8%. EBITDA (net earnings (loss) excluding the earnings/loss from discontinued operations, net; total other expense, net; provision (benefit) for income taxes; depreciation; amortization; and, if any, non-cash impairment charges) was $19.4 million compared to $17.3 million, an increase of 11.7%. (07-26-12) Menu | Contact Us | Subscribe | Advertise | Privacy Policy | About Us

Copyright ? 1989-2012 RADIO ONLINE ?
The publisher makes no claims concerning the validity of the information posted on RADIO ONLINE and will not be held liable for its use. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, incorporated in any information retrieval system or otherwise redistributed without the prior written permission of the publisher.

Source: http://news.radio-online.com/cgi-bin/rol.exe/headline_id=n25202

the national enquirer marie colvin cm punk cm punk lint justin theroux buenos aires train crash

Source: http://odugutumad.posterous.com/journal-communications-reports-positive-q2-ra

xbox live update joan rivers gary carter dies oolong tea survivor one world lil kim progeria

Syria gunships hit rebels amid massacre fears

Syrian gunships pounded rebels and troops clashed with insurgents in Aleppo on Friday as world powers voiced fears of an all-out assault and called for "maximum pressure" to prevent a massacre.

Columns of armed forces and armour have poured into Aleppo over the past two days, with troops firing on a string of rebel neighbourhoods in the battle for control of the pivotal northern city.

The United States showed heightened concern over the government offensive, but rejected comparisons to a Libyan crackdown that triggered international intervention.

Amid widespread expectations that an increasingly desperate President Bashar al-Assad will pull out all the stops to secure Aleppo, residents of some areas of the commercial capital fled in fear of a massacre.

The redeployments were "almost complete," a Syrian security official told AFP, while adding that "rebels are stationed in narrow streets, in which fighting will be difficult."

Colonel Abdel Jabbar al-Okaidi of the rebel Free Syrian Army (FSA) told AFP via Skype that "we expect a major offensive at any time."

Syrian Observatory for Human Rights director Rami Abdel Rahman said: "The question is, to what extent will regime troops resort to excessive use of force, because if this is the case, there will be hundreds of deaths."

Aleppo, Syria's second city, has been the scene of fierce fighting since rebels launched a major offensive on July 20 from rear bases across the nearby border with Turkey.

The Observatory said helicopter gunships attacked the southwest of the city, in the Salaheddin, Bustan al-Qasr, Sukari, Al-Mashhad and Al-Azamiya neighbourhoods.

In Salaheddin, a rebel told AFP by telephone that residents were fleeing and confirmed helicopters had been firing on the district since daybreak. Troops were on the outskirts of the area and had not yet tried to enter.

Troops also clashed with rebels in the central district of Al-Jamaliya, adjacent to the historic old quarter, as well as in Mahatat Baghdad and in Saadallah al-Jabiri Square.

An AFP journalist said people were starting to go hungry in Aleppo because of a shortage of bread.

He also said the FSA was conserving its ammunition, especially rocket-propelled grenades, in anticipation of the expected tank assault.

The Observatory reported at least four deaths in Aleppo on Friday, among 119 people killed nationwide -- 65 civilians, 35 soldiers, 18 rebels and one deserter.

Amid the skirmishes, the rebels captured 150 soldiers and militia members in Aleppo and the northwestern province of Idlib, the Britain-based Observatory said.

On Thursday, pro-government daily Al-Watan said Aleppo would be "the mother of all battles."

"Aleppo will be the last battle waged by the Syrian army to crush the terrorists and, after that, Syria will emerge from the crisis," it said.

A number of powers expressed fears of yet another massacre.

In late May, at least 108 people were killed near the central town of Houla, the United Nations said. On July 12, regime forces killed more than 150 people in the central village of Treimsa, including dozens of rebels, the Observatory said.

White House spokesman Jay Carney rejected on Friday comparisons between Aleppo and Benghazi, the rebel-held Libyan city that was an early focus of the uprising against Moamer Kadhafi.

Kadhafi loyalists launched a major offensive against the Benghazi rebels, and were attacked by an international coalition including the United States enforcing a UN-mandated no-fly zone.

"There were a broader array of issues that allowed for the kind of action that the United States -- you know, the international community, led by the United States, was able to take in Libya," Carney said.

Turkey's Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan urged international action in Syria, saying it was not possible "to remain a spectator" to the regime's offensive on Aleppo.

Erdogan, speaking after meeting British Prime Minister David Cameron in London, urged joint action from the UN Security Council, the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation and the Arab League.

Italy called for "maximum pressure" on Assad to prevent further killings, while UN chief Ban Ki-moon urged his regime to stop its Aleppo offensive.

"I'm seriously concerned by the escalating violence in Aleppo," Ban said in London. "I urge the Syrian government to halt the offensive. The violence from both sides must stop for the sake of suffering civilians."

French foreign ministry spokesman Bernard Valero told AFP that "with the build-up of heavy weapons around Aleppo, Assad is preparing to carry out a fresh slaughter of his own people."

His comments came as two Syrian opposition activists unfurled an enormous rebel flag at the base of the Eiffel Tower in Paris.

In Geneva, UN human rights chief Navi Pillay spoke of atrocities in the regime's ongoing battle to cleanse Damascus of rebels and said Aleppo was also at risk.

"I have been receiving as yet unconfirmed reports of atrocities, including extra-judicial killings and shootings of civilians by snipers" in Damascus, Pillay said.

"It goes without saying that the increasing use of heavy weapons, tanks, attack helicopters and -- reportedly -- even jet fighters in urban areas has already caused many civilian casualties and is putting many more at grave risk."

And the former head of the troubled UN observer mission, Major General Robert Mood, whose mandate to lead a 300-strong mission ended last week amid a sharp spike in violence, said Assad's fall was a matter of time.

"But will it fall in a week or in a year? That is a question I do not dare answer."

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/syria-rebels-brace-decisive-battle-aleppo-043606793.html

Colorado Springs pga tour Nora Ephron mario balotelli mario balotelli jenny mccarthy michael jackson

Friday, July 27, 2012

Boys' impulsiveness may result in better math ability, say MU researchers

Boys' impulsiveness may result in better math ability, say MU researchers [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 27-Jul-2012
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Timothy Wall
walltj@missouri.edu
573-882-3346
University of Missouri-Columbia

COLUMBIA, Mo. In a University of Missouri study, girls and boys started grade school with different approaches to solving arithmetic problems, with girls favoring a slow and accurate approach and boys a faster but more error prone approach. Girls' approach gave them an early advantage, but by the end of sixth grade boys had surpassed the girls. The MU study found that boys showed more preference for solving arithmetic problems by reciting an answer from memory, whereas girls were more likely to compute the answer by counting. Understanding these results may help teachers and parents guide students better.

"The observed difference in arithmetic accuracy between the sexes may arise from a the willingness to risk being wrong by answering from memory before one is sure of the correct answer," said Drew Bailey, a recent recipient of a Ph.D. in psychological science from MU. "In our study, we found that boys were more likely to call out answers than girls, even though they were less accurate early in school. Over time, though, this practice at remembering answers may have allowed boys to surpass girls in accuracy."

The MU study followed approximately 300 children as they progressed from first to sixth grade. In the first and second grades, the boys' tendency to give an answer quickly led to more answers in total, but also more wrong answers. Girls, on the other hand, were right more often, but responded more slowly and to fewer questions. By sixth grade, the boys were answering more problems and getting more correct.

"Developing mathematical skill may be part 'practice makes perfect' and part 'perfect makes practice,'" Bailey said. "Attempting more answers from memory gives risk-takers more practice, which may eventually lead to improvements in accuracy. It also is possible that children who are skilled at certain strategies are more likely to use them and therefore acquire more practice."

"Parents can give their children an advantage by making them comfortable with numbers and basic math before they start grade school, so that the children will have fewer trepidations about calling out answers," said David Geary, MU professor of psychological science and co-author of the study. "As an adult, it seems easy to remember basic math facts, but in children's brains the networks are still forming. It could be that trying to answer a problem from memory engages those networks and improves them, even if the answers aren't correct at first. In time, the brain develops improved memories and more correct answers result."

The study, "The codevelopment of skill at and preference for use of retrieval-based processes for solving addition problems: Individual and sex differences from first to sixth grades," was published in the Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. David Geary is Curators' Professor and a Thomas Jefferson Fellow in the Department of Psychological Sciences in the College of Arts and Science. Drew Bailey will be starting as a post-doctoral fellow at Carnegie Mellon University this fall.

###



[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Boys' impulsiveness may result in better math ability, say MU researchers [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 27-Jul-2012
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Timothy Wall
walltj@missouri.edu
573-882-3346
University of Missouri-Columbia

COLUMBIA, Mo. In a University of Missouri study, girls and boys started grade school with different approaches to solving arithmetic problems, with girls favoring a slow and accurate approach and boys a faster but more error prone approach. Girls' approach gave them an early advantage, but by the end of sixth grade boys had surpassed the girls. The MU study found that boys showed more preference for solving arithmetic problems by reciting an answer from memory, whereas girls were more likely to compute the answer by counting. Understanding these results may help teachers and parents guide students better.

"The observed difference in arithmetic accuracy between the sexes may arise from a the willingness to risk being wrong by answering from memory before one is sure of the correct answer," said Drew Bailey, a recent recipient of a Ph.D. in psychological science from MU. "In our study, we found that boys were more likely to call out answers than girls, even though they were less accurate early in school. Over time, though, this practice at remembering answers may have allowed boys to surpass girls in accuracy."

The MU study followed approximately 300 children as they progressed from first to sixth grade. In the first and second grades, the boys' tendency to give an answer quickly led to more answers in total, but also more wrong answers. Girls, on the other hand, were right more often, but responded more slowly and to fewer questions. By sixth grade, the boys were answering more problems and getting more correct.

"Developing mathematical skill may be part 'practice makes perfect' and part 'perfect makes practice,'" Bailey said. "Attempting more answers from memory gives risk-takers more practice, which may eventually lead to improvements in accuracy. It also is possible that children who are skilled at certain strategies are more likely to use them and therefore acquire more practice."

"Parents can give their children an advantage by making them comfortable with numbers and basic math before they start grade school, so that the children will have fewer trepidations about calling out answers," said David Geary, MU professor of psychological science and co-author of the study. "As an adult, it seems easy to remember basic math facts, but in children's brains the networks are still forming. It could be that trying to answer a problem from memory engages those networks and improves them, even if the answers aren't correct at first. In time, the brain develops improved memories and more correct answers result."

The study, "The codevelopment of skill at and preference for use of retrieval-based processes for solving addition problems: Individual and sex differences from first to sixth grades," was published in the Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. David Geary is Curators' Professor and a Thomas Jefferson Fellow in the Department of Psychological Sciences in the College of Arts and Science. Drew Bailey will be starting as a post-doctoral fellow at Carnegie Mellon University this fall.

###



[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Source: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-07/uom-bim072712.php

toyota recall northern lights sign of the times keystone pipeline purim acc tournament big ten tournament

Atlanta Business Consulting | Partnership With Hungry For A Day ...

Caruso Photography

Twitter is a great thing. I connected with a man named Ben Woodard. He?s an SEO specialist if you?re looking for that kind of service. In turn, I was connected to his friend Aaron Palmer. Through that connection, I was then connected to David Huey. When I moved to Atlanta, I had the chance to meet David and did so at the ?Blogapalooza? event held at EyeSpeak.

That is when I learned about the organization David and Aaron founded called, Hungry For A Day. Here is some info about them:

Hungry For A Day was started by David and Aaron, two college buddies who realized, after spending over ten years in the business world, that there was way more to life than 401k accounts, personal vacations and climbing the corporate ladder. Their vision was to discover an effective way to impact hurting people. From that vision, Hungry For A Day was born.

There are many groups and organizations that are fighting hunger and are worthy of your donations. An area of concern that we have discovered is that while people are aware of significant needs in their communities, they are not sure who to give to. Or, they simply have not given in a long time. What we do is simple. We highlight an organization each month that is doing awesome work and helping to meet the needs of those that go hungry. We challenge you to go hungry, add up what you would have spent on food for that day, and donate that amount to H4AD. With your donation, many more will eat in your place!

Sounds great doesn?t it?

I love their mission and wanted to be a part of that.

That being said, today I am announcing that Caruso Photography is officially partnering with Hungry For A Day on all future photo shoots. Whether it?s a family photo shoot, headshots, band photos, event photography, senior portraits or weddings, a portion of the investment for the shoot will go directly to Hungry For A Day. Pricing details are available over on the photography site.

This is exciting and my hope is to have another local organization be a partner with me as well so that two organizations will benefit whenever somebody has photos done! That decision will hopefully be announced next week.

About Jay Caruso

I am a photographer and businessman living in the Atlanta, Georgia area. I can help with your company branding through the use of photography as well as SEO, social media marketing and business consulting.

Source: http://www.twelvestonescreative.com/hungry-for-a-day/

316 william daley truffles truffles alabama vs lsu alabama vs lsu bcs championship game

Ramirez follows Sanchez out of Miami

NEW YORK (AP) ? The Marlins are trading stars, just like they did following their championships in 1997 and 2003. Team president David Samson says this exodus is different.

"A fire sale I guess comes after a World Series victory," he said Wednesday. "I don't know how you would call it a fire sale to trade players of team that's underperforming so spectacularly. So for us, we are just doing everything we can to win more games."

Former NL batting champion Hanley Ramirez became the latest player to leave, traded to the Los Angeles Dodgers on Wednesday with left-handed reliever Randy Choate for right-hander Nathan Eovaldi and minor league pitcher Scott McGough.

On Monday, the Marlins sent pitcher Anibal Sanchez and infielder Omar Infante to the Detroit Tigers for pitching prospect Jacob Turner and two minor leaguers.

"When we put the team together, none of us had any idea that we would be underperforming en masse," Samson said during a telephone interview. "It's not just one player. It is all players. So one of the hardest things to do is look in the mirror and say that we didn't get it right, and that's what we did. We want to restructure because we want to win games."

As the team prepared to move into its new $634 million retractable-roof ballpark, Marlins owner Jeffrey Loria hired Ozzie Guillen as manager last fall and committed $191 million in a five-day span during the offseason to sign All-Stars Jose Reyes, Mark Buehrle and Heath Bell. The team agreed to star in a Showtime reality series, "The Franchise."

In their colorful new uniforms, the Marlins were 31-23 through June 3, just percentage points out of first place, then lost 17 of their next 20 games. They are 45-53, 13? games out of first place and just a half-game above last.

Samson said president of baseball operations Larry Beinfest approached Loria and Samson after the Marlins lost two of three at the even-worse Chicago Cubs last week.

"He didn't feel as though things were trending properly for us to keep the team as is and make the playoffs," Samson said.

Miami might not be done, with pitcher Josh Johnson and Bell also trade possibilities before Tuesday's deadline to make swaps without waivers.

"Be careful with what you think, what you say, and how you smile because you might be next," Guillen said. "That's the way it has to go if you don't perform. That's business."

After winning the 1997 World Series, the Marlins jettisoned high-priced stars Moises Alou, Kevin Brown, Al Leiter, Robb Nen, Jeff Conine and Devon White. They won the Series again in 2003, then allowed Ivan Rodriguez, Ugueth Urbina, Derrek Lee, Mark Redman, Braden Looper and Juan Encarnacion to depart.

The 28-year-old Ramirez is hitting .249 with 14 home runs and 49 RBIs after going 2 for 4 with a triple, RBI single and walk in the Dodgers' 3-2, 12-inning loss at St. Louis. That's a steep decline from his big season in 2009, when he hit a league-leading .342 with 24 homers and 106 RBIs.

"I am sad to go," Ramirez said as he left the Marlins. "This will be always be my home, but it will just be a little different."

A three-time All-Star, he shifted from shortstop to third base this season to make room for Reyes.

"It's sad to see Hanley go to another team," Reyes said. "We developed a great relationship. I feel he was one of my real good friends on the team."

After losing in Ramirez's first game, Los Angeles remained 2 1-2 games behind NL West-leading San Francisco. The Dodgers followed a 32-15 start by losing 31 of their next 52.

"You never know what a change of scenery will do for somebody," Dodgers general manager Ned Colletti said. "We see him as one of our main guys."

After filing for bankruptcy in 2011, the Dodgers were bought from Frank McCourt for $2 billion on May 1 in a move that led to Stan Kasten becoming team president.

Ramirez has a $15 million salary this year and is owed $15.5 million next year and $16 million in 2013.

"We're not going to let money stand in the way of a true baseball deal. And if we can improve the club, the financial piece of it will always be there," Colletti said. "It's kind of a liberating thing because we're able to make a baseball trade. We found a player that we really like, that we think can add to our lineup and at the same time show the guys who have been busting their tail for the last three months that we acknowledge how hard they've played and to get them the support that we can. It's good to not have to worry too much about what it's going to cost you from a financial standpoint. This (ownership) group is in to win."

Ramirez started at third base on Wednesday night but will shift to his old position as soon as he is comfortable. Dee Gordon is on the disabled list with a torn ligament in his right thumb that could sideline him until mid-August and is batting only .229 with 17 RBIs.

"I look at it as he has a clean slate," Dodgers manager Don Mattingly said. "Anything that's happened in his past has nothing to do with me, has nothing to do with the Dodgers. It's basically moving forward."

Choate, a 36-year-old lefty, is 0-0 with one save and a 2.49 ERA in 44 games. Eovaldi, a 22-year-old righty, is 1-6 with a 4.15 ERA. He is to make his Marlins debut on Saturday against San Diego.

In addition to saving the money owed Ramirez, the Marlins cut Sanchez's $8 million salary.

"The message to our fans is we signed so many players and had such a big payroll not for any other reason than to win games," Samson said, "and it wasn't happening enough."

___

AP Sports Writer Antonio Gonzalez in San Francisco contributed to this report.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/ramirez-follows-sanchez-miami-231402043--mlb.html

celtic thunder fabrice muamba collapse prometheus trailer patrice oneal shamrock slainte the quiet man

Video: More on July 26: Voting rights & wrongs

'Girl' reporters with HIV get taste of power

??Mandisa Madikane and Sthokozo Mabaso are HIV-positive journalists with GlobalGirl Media, which sent them from their homes in Soweto, South Africa, to cover the International AIDS Conference in Washington, D.C. this week. "I know my voice is out there," Madikane said.

Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036697/vp/48344594#48344594

the cabin in the woods the cabin in the woods trace adkins the darkest hour the darkest hour neverland wormwood

Thursday, July 26, 2012

PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale Pre-order Bonus

Sony Computer Entertainment has mentioned what the PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale Pre-order Bonus is: A set of exclusive character costumes.

?Aside from making sure you?ve got a copy on day one, pre-ordering will snag you an exclusive set of costumes for all of the characters in the game! Here are the outfits for the roster so far, but be sure to check back in with us later when we unveil them all.

When the game launches, you?ll have plenty of opportunities to unlock multiple costumes for each character, but these exclusive costumes will only be available if you pre-order. And yes, they?ll be available right when you start playing the game!?

The Amazon pre-order page for PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale reveals what?s included:

?Pre-order PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale and receive the an exclusive set of costumes. This set includes additional costumes for Kratos, Fat Princess, PaRappa, Colonel Radec, Sweet Tooth, Sly Cooper, Nathan Drake, Big Daddy, Heihachi Mishima, and Toro Inoue. We will send you the code to access the costume set via email within two days of your order shipment. Offer valid when shipped and sold by Amazon.com. This offer will be extended to all existing pre-orders. Limit one per customer. Amazon reserves the right to change or terminate this promotion at any time.?

Here?s a live stage demo of PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale from Comic-Con 2012.

PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale will be available from October 23rd, 2012 on PS3 & PS Vita.

Who do you think will be your main in PlayStation All-Stars?


Source: http://www.videogamesblogger.com/2012/07/25/playstation-all-stars-battle-royale-pre-order-bonus.htm

People Water dwight howard Fred Willard Emmy nominations 2012 Ramadan 2012 Michelle Jenneke News

Study: Obese Children Will Have 50% Higher Risk of Colon Cancer ...

Study: Obese Children Will Have 50% Higher Risk of Colon Cancer

The newest reason for doing everything possible to reduce childhood obesity names certain cancers as risks associated with a high BMI.

ObeseCHILDmain.jpg
Joe Tan / ReutersPROBLEM:?Childhood obesity is associated with all sorts of immediate health problems, including high blood pressure, high cholesterol, breathing and joint problems, along with an increased risk of developing diabetes and heart disease. This study set out to examine the relationship between childhood obesity and future diagnoses of urothelial, or bladder, and colorectal cancers.

METHODOLOGY:?Researchers at Tel Aviv University appropriated the health information of 1.1 million males that had been collected by the Israeli Defense Forces and then linked this medical data to the National Cancer Registry. They looked specifically at the rates of urothelial and colorectal cancer over a follow-up period of 18 years in those who were obese, meaning that they had a body mass index (BMI) in the 85th?percentile and above, at age 17. Adjustments were made for year of birth, level of education, and religiosity.

RESULTS:?Those whose BMI placed them in the range of obesity in adolescence had a 1.42% greater chance of developing urothelial or colorectal cancers in adulthood.

CONCLUSION:?Childhood obesity is associated with a 50% higher risk of urothelial or colorectal cancers.

IMPLICATIONS:?While these results only tell us about the incidences of two specific types of cancer, Ari Shamiss, one of the doctors involved in the study, has indicated that he is currently researching connections between childhood obesity and other cancers in the hopes of uncovering other connections. We still need to learn whether obesity is directly causing the high risk of cancer, and, perhaps most essentially, whether losing weight is effective ? and if so, how much and when ? in lowering it.

The full study, ?Overweight in Adolescence is Related to Increased Risk of Future Urothelial Cancer,?is published in the journal?Obesity?.

By?Lindsay Abrams

?This article available online at:

http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/07/study-obese-children-will-have-50-higher-risk-of-colon-cancer/260218/

Copyright ? 2012 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All Rights Reserved.

Source: http://midete.org/study-obese-children-will-have-50-higher-risk-of-colon-cancer/

jennifer love hewitt secret service prostitution 4 20 george zimmerman sheree whitfield weather dallas pat summitt

Commercial Real Estate Rental | General Information Blog

So you're a little confused by all the terms that real estate agents throw around like that?Well do not worry, I can ensure you're in good company. We'll have some of the basics out of the way and then we can pass some of the details. One of the first things you have to understand is that there are several components to the overall rate of rent you ultimately end up paying. It is the rent you pay the landlord for the use of their space, but also as a commercial tenant who also purchase the following articles, and general building maintenance, property taxes, building insurance and management the property. (I know, I know, does not seem fair that you pay for the management and maintenance of the property of another person, but that's the real world, so get used to it.) There are basically two types of rents that are listed on the search for commercial space. This is the gross income and net income. They are two separate ends of the spectrum of what is included in the rent. Gross income is all rental. An actual gross income includes all the above expenses (property taxes, insurance, maintenance, administration, utilities, etc, etc) and any other expenses that may be given to a specific property. Net rent is a type of rent does not include anything else. Net rent is simply the amount you pay the landlord the right to use their space for a period of time. In a single leased property the tenant only pays all additional costs themselves. In multi-occupied properties, such as office buildings or shopping centers to multi-tenant retail net income is often accompanied by additional income (also called CAM / Taxes which means common area and maintenance, plus property taxes) . The additional revenue covers the expenses mentioned above. The additional revenue is usually based on an estimated value of the previous years operating expenses. The total cost of ownership are added together and divided by the square of material cost of the building. The costs are then allocated to each tenant in proportion to the amount of space with the building. So if a building has 10,000 square feet of rentable space, and the tenant has 1,000 square feet of retail store, then pay 10% of total expenditures. The additional revenue is quoted in a Ft per square meter basis as well. In different parts of the country, the income may be quoted differently. In Winnipeg rents quoted are usually cited as a price per square foot per year. In other parts of the country where you can be cited as the price per square foot per month. If in doubt, ask.

Source: http://hvfsc.org/commercial-real-estate-rental

medifast sinead oconnor braylon edwards jimmer fredette mall of america mennonite smokey robinson

Saturday, July 7, 2012

Comprehensive Insurance Policies | Baltimore Share

Home Insurance West View PA Each year, more automobiles and drivers travel the highways. With so many vehicles on the road, accidents will happen. Automobile insurance can be the difference between a minor inconvenience and a major trial. So how do you know what insurance you need and how much to buy? Car insurance protects you by covering the cost of damage caused to your car or another person?s car and injury to others, yourself, or your passengers, plus specific other occurrences, such as theft. Every state and province mandates auto insurance by law. Without insurance, you risk having to pay the total price of any harm you cause others or of repairing or replacing your car if it is damaged or stolen.Liability pays for damages due to bodily injury and property damage to others for which you are responsible. Bodily injury damages include medical expenses, lost wages and pain and suffering. Property damage includes damaged property and loss of use of property. If you are sued, it also pays your defense and court costs. Higher recommended insurances are available that cover more than the lower, state-mandated insurance. Personal injury protection: This is required in some states and is optional in others. It pays you or your passengers for medical treatment resulting from a crash, regardless of who may have been at fault, and is often called no-fault coverage. It may also pay for lost earnings, replacement of services and funeral expenses. State law typically sets minimum amounts. Medical payments: This type of coverage is available in non-no-fault states and will pay no matter who is responsible for the accident. It pays for an insured person?s reasonable and necessary medical or funeral expenses for bodily injury from a crash. Collision: This pays for damage to your car caused by an accident. Comprehensive: This applies if your car is stolen or damaged by causes other than collision, including fire, wind, hail, flood or vandalism. Uninsured motorist: This pays for damages when an insured person is injured in a crash caused by another person who does not have liability insurance or by a person who cannot be identified (usually a hit-and-run driver). Under-insured motorist: This pays for damages when an insured person is injured in a crash caused by another person who does not have enough liability insurance to cover the full amount of the damages. Other coverage, such as emergency road service and car rental, is also available.Your auto insurance payments vary by company and will depend on several factors, including: *Your selected coverage *Your vehicle?s make and model * Your driving record * Your age, gender and marital status and * Where you live Some have come to think of auto insurance as a necessary evil, but it can truly rescue your economic health Evaluate your needs, research your options and with the support of your insurance agent choose the option that best suits you. Property insurance Policies

Source: http://www.baltimorecarshare.org/?p=18816

das racist das racist ginger white conrad murray sentencing conrad murray sentencing urban meyer adam shulman

Friday, July 6, 2012

Ex-wrestling CEO McMahon makes another Senate bid (The Arizona Republic)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories Stories, News Feeds and News via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/237258739?client_source=feed&format=rss

rick perry ad dragnet dragnet immaculate conception immaculate conception rule 5 draft lindsay lohan playboy cover

Change of CEOs after Progress-Duke Energy merger

After the merger of Duke Energy Corp. and Progress Energy Inc., valued at about $32 billion, the newly formed electric company is also changing CEOs.

Duke CEO Jim Rogers, 64, was named CEO of the new company, which is now the largest electric company in the nation, according to the Associated Press. Bill Johnson, 58, who was expected to become the new company's president and chief executive, left the company citing a "mutual agreement."

The new company will provide services to more than 7 million customers in Florida, North Carolina, Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana and South Carolina, according to the AP.

Progress Energy Florida?

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/vertical_30/~3/ZKgsGs-jMY4/change-of-ceos-after-duke-energy-merger.html

indy 500 angelina jolie leg daytona jeff gordon artie lange nascar daytona 2012 kasey kahne

Mitt Romney Sours On Chief Justice John Roberts (VIDEO)

  • Nancy Pelosi

  • Speaker John Boehner

  • Jerrold Nadler

    "Today, in upholding the Affordable Care Act, the Supreme Court has shown that, even at a time when Washington seems to have reached a new level of dysfunction, there remains a respect for the rule of law, for precedent, and for the ability of Congress to legislate on matters that affect the American people," Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said in a statement. "By not caving in to the most craven political calls, it appears the Court has stood by more than 70 years of legal precedent to ensure that: some 32 million Americans will have access to health insurance; we stop the unnecessary deaths of 42,000 Americans annually who die simply because they lack health insurance; insurers can no longer deny a child health care because of pre-existing conditions; millions of young adults receive coverage on their parents' plans until age 26; insurers can no longer impose lifetime limits on coverage; millions of Americans receive free preventive care; and, seniors save billions of dollars on prescription drugs. "The Affordable Care Act will now assume its rightful place, along with Social Security and Medicare, as powerful testimony to what our nation can achieve to benefit the lives of all Americans. Today's decision will, I truly hope, put to rest the partisan attacks from the Right against the law and many of its provisions. Republicans have threatened to continue their attempts to repeal these provisions, but let us all hope that they will respect the Court's ruling and put the health and wellbeing of the American people ahead of insurance companies."

  • Mitch McConnell

    "Today's decision makes one thing clear: Congress must act to repeal this misguided law," said Sen. Republican Leader Mitch McConnell. "Obamacare has not only limited choices and increased health care costs for American families, it has made it harder for American businesses to hire. Today's decision does nothing to diminish the fact that Obamacare's mandates, tax hikes, and Medicare cuts should be repealed and replaced with common sense reforms that lower costs and that the American people actually want. It is my hope that with new leadership in the White House and Senate, we can enact these step-by-step solutions and prevent further damage from this terrible law."

  • Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell (R)

    Republican Governors Association Chairman Bob McDonnell issued the following statement regarding the Supreme Court's decision to uphold the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: "Today's ruling crystallizes all that's at stake in November's election. The only way to stop Barack Obama's budget-busting health care takeover is by electing a new president. Barack Obama's health care takeover encapsulates his Presidency: Obamacare increases taxes, grows the size of government and puts bureaucrats over patients while doing nothing to improve the economy. It's never been more important that we elect a President who understands the marketplace and will make job creation his top priority. By replacing Barack Obama with Mitt Romney, we will not only stop the federal government's healthcare takeover, but will also take a giant step towards a full economic recovery."

  • Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.)

    "Dr. Coburn will be reviewing the ruling and will respond with an updated plan to repeal and replace this unworkable law. The Court affirmed Congress' power to tax people if they don't eat their broccoli. Now it's up to the American people to decide whether they will tolerate this obscene abuse of individual liberty," said John Hart, a spokesman for Sen. Coburn.

  • RNC Chair Reince Preibus

    "Today's Supreme Court decision sets the stakes for the November election. Now, the only way to save the country from ObamaCare's budget-busting government takeover of health care is to elect a new president," said RNC Chairman Reince Priebus. "Under President Obama's signature legislation, health care costs continue to skyrocket, and up to 20 million Americans could lose their employer-based coverage. A panel of unelected bureaucrats now has the unprecedented authority to come between elderly patients and their doctors. Meanwhile, the rules and regulations placed on job creators and small businesses make it nearly impossible to hire new workers at a time when Americans desperately need jobs. "We need market-based solutions that give patients more choice, not less. The answer to rising health care costs is not, and will never be, Big Government. "We must elect a president who understands the economy, respects free enterprise, and can provide the leadership we now so desperately need. On Election Day, we must elect Mitt Romney and put America on the path toward a brighter economic future and successful health care reform."

  • Chellie Pingree

  • Pete Hoekstra

  • Tom Rooney

  • Rep. W Todd Akin

  • Rep.George Miller

  • LEETERRYNE

  • Ari Fleischer

  • Brian Walsh

  • Eric Schneiderman

  • Marco Rubio

  • Rep. Keith Ellison

  • Sarah Palin

  • Gov. Bobby Jindal

  • John Dingell

  • Gov.Robert Bentley

  • Ben Quayle

  • Eric Cantor

    Today, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) released the following statement on the Supreme Court ruling on the President's health care law: "The Supreme Court's decision to uphold ObamaCare is a crushing blow to patients throughout the country. ObamaCare has failed to keep the President's basic promise of allowing those who like their health care to keep it, while increasing costs and reducing access to quality care for patients. In this tough economy, jobs and economic growth are on the minds of most Americans, but ObamaCare has increased uncertainty for small businessmen and women and forced them to put their hiring decisions on hold. "During the week of July 9th, the House will once again repeal ObamaCare, clearing the way for patient-centered reforms that lower costs and increase choice. We support an approach that offers simpler, more affordable and more accessible health care that allows people to keep the health care that they like. "The Court's decision brings into focus the choice the American people have about the direction of our country. The President and his party believe in massive government intrusions that increase costs and take decisions away from patients. In contrast, Republicans believe in patient-centered, affordable care where health care decisions are made by patients, their families and their doctors, not by the federal government."

  • Steny Hoyer

    House Democratic Whip Steny H. Hoyer (MD) released the following statement today after the Supreme Court's decision on the Affordable Care Act: "Our highest court has weighed in, and its decision to uphold the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is a victory for all Americans who have ever worried about being able to access or afford the care they need. Democrats are proud to have worked hard to pass this landmark legislation in 2010 and of our efforts to make sure it is implemented in a way that continues to yield new benefits for patients, employers, and care providers. "The Affordable Care Act made it illegal for insurance companies to discriminate against patients on the basis of pre-existing conditions, allowed young people to remain on their parents' plans until age 26, and prohibited insurance companies from charging women higher premiums than men. The Medicare Part D 'donut hole' is closing, and seniors on Medicare now have access to free preventive services like mammograms and colonoscopies. Moreover, the Affordable Care Act provides deficit savings of more than $1 trillion over the next two decades. The Affordable Care Act further brought peace of mind to the 30 million uninsured Americans who will finally be able to access affordable coverage once the law is fully implemented. "Republicans have been trying to repeal the Affordable Care Act since the day it was enacted, and they have been eagerly awaiting today's ruling. But they must now accept that the Affordable Care Act will remain in place and that the time for litigation and partisan posturing on this issue ought to come to an end. Republicans now have a responsibility to work with Democrats to implement the Affordable Care Act, and I call on them to do so in order to make care affordable and accessible to Americans."

  • Tim Kaine

    Following the Supreme Court's decision affirming the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, former Governor and U.S. Senate candidate Tim Kaine today released the following statement: "The Affordable Care Act is an important first step in curbing discriminatory insurance company practices and increasing access to health care, but more needs to be done to bring down costs. Our government, businesses, and citizens cannot continue to spend more than any other nation on health care while getting second-rate results. As Senator, I am committed to working with all stakeholders to find additional improvements to the Affordable Care Act that give all Americans affordable access to high quality services. "While there is more work to do, it is worth noting what has already been accomplished under the Affordable Care Act. Nearly 63,000 more young people in Virginia have health coverage, more than 800,000 Virginia seniors have received free preventive care, millions of small businesses are now eligible for tax credits, and twenty million American women have access to cancer screenings and contraception without co-pays. And we've put an end to the egregious abuses by insurance companies that denied coverage to children with preexisting conditions, charged women higher premiums for the same coverage, and dropped folks when they got sick. "My opponent regularly calls for a full repeal of this law, despite the positive results it's already delivering for Virginia. In the decade encompassing George Allen's six years as a U.S. Senator, the average insurance premium for families more than doubled and over 12 million more Americans were uninsured. Clearly, inaction was not a solution, and neither are continued calls for repeal. Instead we must work together to strengthen this existing program and improve cost controls."

  • Orrin Hatch

  • Senator Jeff Merkley

  • Sen. Robert Menendez

  • Rep. Nancy Pelosi

    "In passing health reform, we made history for our nation and progress for the American people. We completed the unfinished business of our society and strengthened the character of our country. We ensured health care would be a right for all, not a privilege for the few. Today, the Supreme Court affirmed our progress and protected that right, securing a future of health and economic security for the middle class and for every American."

  • Rep. Marcia Fudge

    "This is a victory for all Americans. In my district alone an estimated 7,000 children with pre-existing health conditions can no longer be denied coverage by health insurers; thousands of seniors will receive Medicare preventive services with no out-of-pocket co-pays or deductibles; thousands of seniors on Medicare will receive an average discount of $490 per person on the cost of prescription drugs. Now, 470 small businesses in the district will have the opportunity to receive tax credits to help maintain or expand health care coverage for their employees, insurance companies can be banned from establishing lifetime coverage limits for 160,000 residents, and $4 million in public health grants will make their way to community health centers, hospitals and doctors to improve the community's health."

  • Rep. John Boehner

    "The president's health care law is hurting our economy by driving up health costs and making it harder for small businesses to hire. Today's ruling underscores the urgency of repealing this harmful law in its entirety. What Americans want is a common-sense, step-by-step approach to health care reform that will protect Americans' access to the care they need, from the doctor they choose, at a lower cost. Republicans stand ready to work with a president who will listen to the people and will not repeat the mistakes that gave our country ObamaCare."

  • Rep. Peter Welch

    "Amidst the contentious national health care debate over the last two years, there has been widespread consensus on one thing: America's health care system is broken. The only beneficiaries of the status quo are insurance companies and their executives. Working families need the peace of mind and that comes with quality and affordable health care coverage. And businesses need to compete in a global economy without the heavy burden of skyrocketing employee health care premiums. With this landmark decision now behind us, both parties should set political differences aside and make this law work for the American people. It won't be easy, but it's time to get back to work."

  • Ken Cuccinelli

  • John Thune

    "Prior to the passage of ObamaCare, Speaker Pelosi infamously said Congress had to pass the bill to 'find out what is in it,' and two years later Americans now know that ObamaCare is making things worse," said Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.). "Worker health insurance costs have gone up 17 percent, family premiums have increased by $1,700, and small businesses and individuals throughout the country now face costly mandates and taxes. "While today's decision is disappointing, Congressional Republicans will not rest until ObamaCare is fully repealed. Rather than jam a nearly 3,000-page bill through Congress using political favors and backroom deals, as was the case with ObamaCare, Congressional Republicans are committed to working across the aisle in a step-by-step manner to improve and expand access to health care, while reducing costs for Americans."

  • Newt Gingrich

  • Barbara Boxer

    "The Supreme Court's ruling is a victory for America's families, who deserve affordable health care," said Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) "The decision is great news for the millions of Californians who have already seen the benefits of this law - including the six million who now have access to free preventive health services, 355,000 young adults who now have coverage on their parents' health plans and 320,000 seniors who have received help in paying for their prescription drugs. "Now Americans will have the certainty of knowing they won't be denied coverage because of a preexisting condition. Women won't be charged a higher premium because of their gender. And families struggling with serious illnesses will not face lifetime limits on coverage. "We will continue to fight Republican efforts to repeal these important health benefits while we work to make sure every American has access to quality, affordable health care."

  • Scott Walker

    "I continue to oppose ObamaCare," said Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker. "One of my first acts as Governor was to authorize Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen to add Wisconsin to the federal lawsuit opposing ObamaCare. Wisconsin will not take any action to implement ObamaCare. I am hopeful that political changes in Washington D.C. later this year ultimately end the implementation of this law at the federal level. If there is no political remedy from Washington and the law moves forward, it would require the majority of people in Wisconsin to pay more money for less healthcare. Additionally, it would increase the size and cost of government, decrease the quality of healthcare and, in our state, reduce access for those truly in need of assistance." The federal government should not tell individuals and families what to do with healthcare. The alternative is more transparency and a more active role by consumers, so we can truly control costs.

  • Rand Paul

    "Just because a couple people on the Supreme Court declare something to be 'constitutional' does not make it so," said Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) "The whole thing remains unconstitutional. While the court may have erroneously come to the conclusion that the law is allowable, it certainly does nothing to make this mandate or government takeover of our health care right." "Obamacare is wrong for Americans. It will destroy our health care system. This now means we fight every hour, every day until November to elect a new President and a new Senate to repeal Obamacare," Paul continued.

  • Allen West

    "The United States Supreme Court has ruled to uphold the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act by extending the power of the United States Congress to tax Americans' behavior," said Rep. Allen West (R-Fla). "This is a sad day for Americans, as they will be taxed to pay for benefits they may not need or want as part of the insurance they are forced to buy. With this decision, Congress has been granted infinite taxation power, and there are no longer any limits on what the federal government can tax its citizens to do. "The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act will hit the middle class especially hard, as hundreds of thousands of jobs will be lost as businesses try to avoid the penalties and costs created by the healthcare law. The healthcare law will cost trillions of dollars, raise costs for employers and create huge incentives for them to drop health insurance. "Benjamin Franklin did indeed state, 'In this world, nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.'However, Dr. Franklin never envisioned the federal government would use its power of taxation to punish people for not purchasing health care. Today, individual sovereignty in America has been defeated."

  • Dennis Kucinich

    "Today's ruling demonstrates that health care is not the third rail in American politics. It demonstrates that reform is possible. It demonstrates that Medicare for All is inevitable," said Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Oh.) "The Affordable Care Act provided health care to those most vulnerable among us - those of the lowest income - by expanding Medicaid, a health insurance program for low-income Americans. It provided much-needed benefits. "In today's ruling, the Supreme Court held that states have the power to reject that expansion and maintain the status quo. That means that in states in which the governor decides not to prioritize providing health care to the poor, even though the federal government is paying for the vast majority of the expansion, the poor can be left out in the cold. "Today is an important day for millions of Americans who will not be denied benefits under the Affordable Care Act. But this is not the end of the conversation. Medicare for All is the solution America needs to stop the ever-rising costs of health care and provide full coverage for everyone. I supported the Affordable Health Care Act as a step in the right direction, but it is only the first step in a long journey. "States are not waiting for Congress to act. Vermont is moving forward on a single payer system, led by a push from small and medium-sized businesses who are getting crushed by health care costs. California has passed a Medicare for All system out of their legislature twice only to be vetoed by the Republican governor. Fourteen of the fifteen studies have showed that if a state went for a Medicare for All system, it would be cost neutral or save up to $19 billion per year while at the same time insuring everyone and improving the quality of care. Congress must help the states fulfill the will of their constituents," said Kucinich.

  • Frank Lautenberg

    "On this day, history was made in America. This is a victory for the people, and makes clear that help is on the way for 30 million Americans who need access to affordable health insurance," said Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ). "Middle class families are struggling to afford health insurance and Obamacare will throw them a lifeline. It is time for the Republicans to stop the politically inspired attacks and work with us to extend this law's help to as many people as possible. With this ruling, Americans finally will have the peace of mind to know that their families will be taken care of when they get sick. President Obama has courageously stood up to false, political attacks, and his hard work was vindicated today."

  • Tim Johnson

    "I applaud today's Supreme Court decision to uphold the health care reform law," said Sen. Tim Johnson (D-SD). "This is a huge win for South Dakotans and the nation. I have always believed health care reform was constitutional. Critically, the Supreme Court upheld the individual mandate. "From kids to seniors, health care reform has made a positive difference in the lives of tens of thousands of South Dakotans. More than 9,000 young adults in South Dakota have been covered under their parent's health insurance policies since the beginning of the year. "Nearly 100,000 South Dakotans on Medicare received free preventive services like mammograms and colonoscopies as a result of health reform. Already this year, beneficiaries reaching the donut hole have saved an average of $690 on prescription drugs with the help of health reform. "I look forward to continue working with members of both parties to reduce health care costs and increase health insurance coverage. The Supreme Court decision upholding the health care reform law gives us the foundation to do just that."

  • Jon Tester

    "After my daughter was born, our family had to give up health insurance because we couldn't afford it--a situation too many other Montana families have faced," said Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mt.) "I'm pleased the Supreme Court has validated Congress' work to ensure access to health care for all Montanans. "Today's ruling doesn't mean this responsible, constitutional law can't be improved. But it is an important step forward in the fight to fix a broken system and hold big insurance companies accountable to Montana families. "Insurance companies will now continue to insure people who are sick or have pre-existing conditions--like being pregnant. Young people will stay on their parents' health insurance plans. Seniors will continue paying less for prescription drugs. And 14,000 Montana veterans will now receive health insurance."

  • Tom Udall

    "When Congress and President Obama first took up this issue, we knew it wouldn't be easy," said Sen. Tom Udall (D-NM). "The Supreme Court's decision to uphold the Affordable Care Act is the best possible outcome for the American people. Today, quality, affordable health care is a major step closer to becoming a reality for millions of Americans who live one accident or diagnosis away from losing everything. For these families, health care is an economic matter with the very real consequences of life, death and bankruptcy. As a nation, and across New Mexico, we cannot afford to go back to just a short time ago when insurance coverage for all was further from reach, when children with cancer could be denied coverage, and when unemployed, recent college graduates would be kicked off their parents' insurance by age 22. "We can still improve upon the law we've put into place, but today, New Mexico has already received more than $200 million in grants and loans to establish an insurance exchange, strengthen community health centers, train new health professionals and so much more. Since passing the law, more than 26,000 young adults under 26-years-old in our state have been allowed to stay on their parents' insurance plans. Almost 20,000 New Mexico seniors on Medicare received a rebate to help cover prescription costs when they hit the donut hole in 2010. And 285,000 New Mexicans with private health insurance no longer have to pay a deductible or copayment for preventive care like physicals, cancer screenings and vaccinations. More is yet to come. "Today's decision marks another turning point in our country's approach to health care equality. Now's the time to put aside partisanship and work together to make our health care policy even stronger."

  • Kirsten Gillibrand

    "I am pleased the Supreme Court reaffirmed the hard fought progress that was made to ensure that no one can be denied coverage for a pre-existing condition, being a woman will no longer be a pre-existing condition, young adults will be covered, prescription drug costs for seniors will be reduced, preventive care including life-saving mammograms will be accessible and that insurance companies can't cancel their coverage when you get sick," said Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY). "It is time to get beyond scoring political points and get back to finding common core values and passing legislation that will help grow our economy and get more people back to work."

  • Jim DeMint

    "The Supreme Court may have failed to stop this government takeover of health care, but the American people will not," said Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC). "Since the day this law was rammed through Congress, the American people have demanded repeal, and today's ruling doesn't make Obamacare any less dangerous to our nation's health. Freedom-loving Americans are disappointed, but we cannot be discouraged. "The President's health care law must be fully repealed as all of its promises have proven false. We were told it was not a tax hike, but this ruling confirms it is an unprecedented and enormous tax on the poor and middle class Americans. President Obama needs to explain why he is enacting this middle class tax hike over the objections of the American people during the worst economic recovery since the Great Depression. "We were told it would lower health costs, but health care premiums are exploding. We were told that Americans could keep their personal health plans, but millions will now lose it. We were told it would improve our economy, but it is now the largest obstacle to employers hiring new workers. "This government takeover of health care remains as destructive, unsustainable, and unconstitutional as it was the day it was passed, unread, by a since-fired congressional majority. Now as then, our first step toward real health care reform and economic renewal remains Obamacare's full repeal, down to the last letter and punctuation mark. "I urge every governor to stop implementing the health care exchanges that would help implement the harmful effects of this misguided law. Americans have loudly rejected this federal takeover of health care, and governors should join with the people and reject its implementation." "The President's health care law will not reform anything, but is already undermining what does still work in America's health care system. We cannot build a free market health care system on this flawed structure of centralized government control, we must repeal all of it and start over with commonsense solutions that make health care more affordable and accessible for every American. We can allow Americans to purchase lower cost plans from other states, support state high-risk pools to cover those with pre-existing conditions, medical-malpractice reform to end frivolous lawsuits, and tax equity so Americans who don't get their health insurance from an employer are not penalized." "Today's decision, however unfortunate, nonetheless represents an opportunity to all Americans, to claim their right to create a health care system of, for, and by the people, not government or special interests. The American people now have the chance and Congress has the responsibility to fully repeal this Washington takeover and reform health care ourselves, together, around the principles of individual liberty, not government mandates. "The same freedom that made America strong and prosperous will make us healthier, too, so long as politicians remember that the health care system is supposed to serve our people, and not the other way around."

  • Ken Cuccinelli

    "This is a dark day for the American people, the Constitution, and the rule of law," said Virginia Attorney General and Republican gubernatorial candidate Ken Cuccinelli. "This is a dark day for American liberty. "This decision goes against the very principle that America has a federal government of limited powers; a principle that the Founding Fathers clearly wrote into the Constitution, the supreme law of the land. The Constitution was meant to restrict the power of government precisely for the purpose of protecting your liberty and mine from the overreaching hand of the federal government. "This unprecedented decision says that Congress has the authority to force citizens to buy private goods or face fines - a power it has never had in American history, and a power King George III and Parliament didn't have over us when we were mere subjects of Great Britain. Since the federal government itself could never articulate to the court a constitutional limit to this power, Congress has gained an unlimited power to force citizens to buy anything. "I am disappointed with the court's ruling and with the unprecedented attack on American liberty the president and the previous Congress have created with this law. "We are currently reading the decision and I will have more comment at the news conference at noon."

  • Sander Levin

    "The winners today are the American people," said Rep. Sander Levin (D-Mich). After nearly five decades - spanning eight presidents - we have succeeded in enacting comprehensive health care reform. Americans are already benefitting from the law's provisions that prevent the worst insurance company abuses, expand preventive care, reduce prescription drug costs for seniors, and allow young adults to stay on their parents' insurance. "Now we can move forward and implement the law's provisions that will expand coverage, and reform our overall system to reduce costs for middle class families. I urge my Republican colleagues to respect the opinion of the Court and end their misleading and partisan all-out assault on health care reform."

  • Justin Amash

    "The Supreme Court missed an historic opportunity to rein in the federal government," said Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich). For decades, Congress has stretched the Constitution to authorize whatever new mandate it invents. Instead of acting as an impartial referee, the Court has been complicit in allowing Congress and the President to expand their power at the expense of state governments and the people. "The Court's decision green lights the continued expansion of the size and scope of the federal government. It also underscores the need to have congressmen who resist the impulse to aggrandize power in Washington. Now more than ever, Congress must commit itself to following the Constitution and limiting the federal government. We can begin to fulfill that commitment by repealing the President's health care law in its entirety."

  • Chris Christie

    "I've been clear from the very beginning that I do not believe a one-size-fits-all health care program works for the entire country and that each governor should have the ability to make decisions about what works best for their state," said New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R). "Today's Supreme Court decision is disappointing and I still believe this is the wrong approach for the people of New Jersey who should be able to make their own judgments about health care. Most importantly, the Supreme Court is confirming what we knew all along about this law - it is a tax on middle class Americans."

  • Kevin McCarthy

    "From the moment ObamaCare was introduced, House Republicans and the American people have expressed concerns about the impacts it would have on the cost and quality of care, our economy and the national debt," said House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif). "One of the first votes of our new Majority was for the full repeal of ObamaCare; since then, the House has voted twenty-nine additional times to defund, dismantle or repeal it. "The Court's ruling makes one thing clear - it is up to Congress to act to repeal the impending health care tax increases on American families. That is why House Republicans will move forward to fully repeal ObamaCare in order to prevent further harm to our economy, job creation and the cost and quality of care. More than two years after its passage, healthcare costs have gone up and millions of Americans are at risk of losing their current coverage. The impact of pending tax hikes on hardworking families and small businesses, massive new debt-fueled spending and the proliferation of burdensome regulations is adding to the uncertainty that is already holding back economic growth and job creation. We need to make reforms to our health care system that will actually lower costs, protect American innovation and provide certainty to American families and small business owners - we cannot achieve this unless we have full repeal."

  • Rick Santorum

    "Today's outcome is the worst of all scenarios. Not only are our rights being taken away and Americans are being forced to do something we don't want to do, but now we are being burdened with the biggest permanent tax increase in our nation's history. This is a sad day. "I believe so strongly that if we do not defeat President Obama this November and elect more conservatives in the House and Senate, our country's future prosperity is at risk," said Rick Santorum. "We saw the absolute disregard President Obama showed for the Supreme Court's ruling on the Arizona immigration law, that I have no doubt that he sees today's ruling in his favor as a mandate that he can now do whatever he chooses by any means possible. "President Obama believes he is above the law, entitled to abusing his power to get what he wants, and willing to violate the constitution and the oath he was sworn to uphold. He has proven to be a very dangerous person to have this kind of power, and if he is not stopped this November, I am fearful that the make-up of this country as established by our founders will never be the same."

  • Steve Israel

    "Today's ruling isn't a political victory for Democrats, it's a victory for America's middle class and seniors, and now House Republicans need to drop their partisan obstruction and move on," said DCCC Chairman Steve Israel. "Insurance companies are not back in control of a patient's care. Insurance companies can't again deny coverage to people with asthma, cancer or heart disease, or block women from getting cancer screenings. "Republicans have wasted the last 18 months on a misguided, partisan crusade to put insurance companies back in charge of health care, instead of getting the economy back on track and strengthening the middle class. "Democrats will continue to fight Republicans' wrong priorities: putting insurance companies back in charge of health care and drastically cutting Medicare, raising health care costs for seniors while protecting tax breaks for millionaires, Big Oil and corporations that ship jobs overseas."

  • Louise Slaughter

    "I am very pleased that the Supreme Court has upheld the landmark Affordable Care Act," said Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY). "I was proud to bring this bill to the floor of the House of Representatives as Chairwoman of the Rules Committee in 2009, and I continue to be proud of the ways in which the law has improved health care access for millions of Americans. We worked long and hard to protect Medicare's guarantee of quality health care for our seniors and to make health care more affordable for American families. The ACA also ensures that being a woman is no longer a pre-existing condition and a justification for higher premiums. "This groundbreaking legislation was never about politics - it was about saving lives and safeguarding the health and wellbeing of American families. I know that much work remains to be done but I am gratified to know that we are a step closer to ensuring that no American will live in fear of losing their home and everything they own because they or a member of their family is stricken by illness."

  • Lloyd Doggett

    "This is a significant victory for every family and small business denied insurance or overcharged or mistreated by an insurer," said Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas). "And it is a victory for seniors who gain better Medicare coverage. Now we must continue our struggle to overcome the naysayers and obstructionists to assure each family has access to a family doctor."

  • Chuck Schumer

    "This decision preserves not only the health care law, but also the Supreme Court's position as an institution above politics. Just as Speaker Boehner vowed not to spike the football if the law was overturned, Republicans should not carry on out of pique now that the law has been upheld," said Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY). "Democrats remain willing to cooperate on potential improvements to the law, but now that all three branches of government have ratified this law, the time for quarreling over its validity is over. Congress must now return its full-time focus to the issue that matters most to the public, and that is jobs."

  • Mary Fallin

    "Oklahomans have voiced their opposition to the federal health care bill from the very beginning, having approved a constitutional amendment to block the implementation of this bill in our state," said Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin (R). "We believe that, rather than Big Government bureaucracy and one-size-fits-all solutions, the free-market principles of choice and competition are the best tools at our disposal to increase access to health care and reduce costs. "I'm extremely disappointed and frustrated by the Supreme Court's decision to uphold the federal health care law. President Obama's health care policies will limit patients' health care choices, reduce the quality of health care in the United States, and will cost the state of Oklahoma more than a half billion dollars in the process. "Today's decision highlights the importance of electing leaders who will work to repeal the federal health care law and replace it with meaningful reform focused on commonsense, market based changes."

  • Sam Brownback

    "Stopping ObamaCare is now in the hands of the American people," said Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback (R). "It begins with electing a new president this fall."

  • "I'm clearly disappointed in the outcome of this decision," Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) told HuffPost's Greg Rosalsky. "This was unconstitutional. For Congress to compel the American people to purchase a product or service because they say so; there is no basis in the Constitution for Congress doing that to the American people. No basis, compelling Americans to spend their money to purchase a product or service. Now Congress, without any limitation whatsoever; they can force you to go out and buy Ikea. They can force you to go out and buy Solyndra products. They can force you to buy anything they want you to buy. That is, the founders would turn over in their graves if they heard this decision."

  • Fundraising email from GOP candidate for the Senate in Indiana, Richard Mourdock: <blockquote>The Supreme Court's momentous decision to uphold Obamacare cements the stakes for the 2012 elections. We need a conservative majority in the Senate to REPEAL IT! I am ready for REPEAL. Are you? The press is reporting that Joe Donnelly, Indiana's Democratic Senate nominee, is "Not Running From" his unwavering support of Obamacare (Northwest Indiana Times, 5/20/12). And why not? Donnelly has been Obamacare's best friend. He was one of the deciding votes on the bill and has loudly trumpeted his support of the government health care takeover. And now we know that Obama's machine plans on paying him back with a blank check for his campaign - including $300,000+ for attack ads against me. Will you help me fight back by contributing $50 before Saturday's federal fundraising deadline? A lot of Americans wondered why Joe Donnelly - a member of the anti-Obamacare Stupak 12 - initially opposed the bill, but then became a deciding vote FOR Obamacare. I guess we know what he got - unwavering financial support from national Democrats. They are now 100% committed to making him a U.S. Senator and giving Harry Reid another loyal lieutenant. That's why we can't let up. We are fighting against the entire Democratic machine that's paying back Joe Donnelly for years of voting in lockstep with Obama. And now the campaign finance deadline is coming up. Let's show Democrats that we are ready for their negative attacks. Help us create a conservative majority in the U.S. Senate by donating $50 today. Sincerely, Richard Richard Mourdock Republican Candidate, US Senate (IN)</blockquote>

  • Chris Coons

    "Today's historic decision by the Supreme Court is an important moment for our country," said Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del). "The people of Delaware today have renewed confidence that they cannot be denied health care coverage because of pre-existing conditions. That is a victory for the people of the United States. "The Supreme Court has reaffirmed today its appropriate role in our constitutional order and continued its longstanding practice of deciding cases based on the law and not the prevailing politics of the day. Something as complex and important as health care reform should rise or fall based on an election, not a Court decision. "The politics of health care reform have always paled in comparison to the people impacted by it. The good news is that every American will now beguaranteed the opportunity to buy health insurance, regardless of pre-existing conditions. Parents will be able to have their sons and daughters covered on their plans until they are 26. No American will be denied coverage because of a cap on lifetime benefits, and insurance companies will no longer be able toautomatically charge women higher premiums. Preventative care will come without a co-pay or deductible, and even if your employer doesn't offer health insurance, you'll be able to buy affordable health coverage. These are all very good things for our country and our communities. "It is now time for the politics of health care reform -- and the politicians who have tried to undo the progress our country has made -- to move on. It has been considered, debated, signed into law, and now affirmed by the Supreme Court."

  • Martin O'Malley

    "President Obama and Congress chose to pass the Affordable Care Act because the status quo was hurting our ability to create jobs, expand opportunity, and protect the health of our children and parents," Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley (D) said in a co-statement with Maryland Lt. Gov Anthony G. Brown. "In upholding the Affordable Care Act, the U.S. Supreme Court chose to protect the lives of millions of Marylanders and millions of Americans. American businesses will be more competitive in the global economy with lower health care costs and a healthier workforce. Parents will be able to keep their children on their health care plans until age 26. Seniors will avoid the Medicare Donut Hole. And by 2014, no American will be denied health care coverage because of a pre-existing condition. "Today's decision gives considerable momentum to our health care reform efforts here in Maryland. What it does not - and indeed must not - do, is give us license to take our eye off the ball or slow our progress. Moms, dads, and kids throughout Maryland are counting on their elected leaders to continue the mission of lowering costs, and improving the quality of care. "We remain as committed as ever to moving forward on behalf of our families. We must move forward, not back."

  • Harry Reid

    Transcript of comments by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) on the Senate Floor: <blockquote>MR. PRESIDENT, I'M HAPPY, I'M PLEASED TO SEE THE SUPREME COURT PUT THE RULE OF LAW AHEAD OF PARTISANSHIP AND RULED THAT THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT IS CONSTITUTIONAL. NOW, MR. PRESIDENT, THIS IS A LONG OPINION, AND WE KNOW THAT WHEN WE COME BACK HERE AFTER THE ELECTIONS, THERE MAY BE SOME THINGS WE NEED TO DO TO IMPROVE THE LAW AND WE'LL DO THAT WORKING TOGETHER, BUT TODAY MILLIONS OF AMERICANS ARE ALREADY SEEING THE BENEFITS OF THE LAW THAT WE PASSED. SENIORS ARE SAVING MONEY ON THEIR PRESCRIPTIONS AND CHECKUPS. CHILDREN CAN NO LONGER BE DENIED INSURANCE BECAUSE THEY HAVE A PREEXISTING CONDITION. PROTECTION THAT WILL SOON EXTEND TO EVERY AMERICAN. NO LONGER WILL AMERICAN FAMILIES BE A CAR ACCIDENT OR A HEART ATTACK AWAY FROM BANKRUPTCY. MR. PRESIDENT, I JUST HAD -- EVERY THURSDAY, I HAVE A WELCOME TO WASHINGTON. TODAY THEY HAD A GROUP OF PEOPLE FROM NEVADA WHO HAVE OR HAVE RELATIVES THAT HAVE CYSTIC FIBROSIS. IT'S BEEN SO HARD FOR THESE YOUNG PEOPLE TO GET INSURANCE. IT'S NOT GOING TO BE THAT WAY ANYMORE, MR. PRESIDENT. NO LONGER WILL AMERICANS LIVE IN FEAR OF LOSING THEIR HEALTH INSURANCE BECAUSE THEY LOSE A JOB. NO LONGER WILL TENS OF MILLIONS OF AMERICANS RELY ON EMERGENCY ROOM CARE OR GO WITHOUT CARE ENTIRELY BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO INSURANCE AT ALL. VIRTUALLY EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD IN AMERICA WILL HAVE ACCESS TO HEALTH INSURANCE THEY CAN AFFORD AND THE VITAL CARE THEY NEED. PASSING THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT WAS THE GREATEST SINGLE STEP IN GENERATIONS TOWARD ENSURING ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE, QUALITY HEALTH CARE FOR EVERY PERSON IN AMERICA, REGARDLESS OF WHERE THEY LIVE, HOW MUCH MONEY THEY MAKE. MR. PRESIDENT, UNFORTUNATELY, REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS CONTINUE TO TARGET THE RIGHTS AND BENEFITS GUARANTEED UNDER THIS LAW. I'D LIKE TO GIVE THE POWER BACK TO THE INSURANCE COMPANIES, THE POWER OF LIFE AND DEATH BACK TO THE INSURANCE COMPANIES, BUT OUR SUPREME COURT HAS SPOKEN. THE MATTER IS SETTLED. NO ONE THINKS THIS LAW IS PERFECT. THE PRESIDING OFFICER DOESN'T, I DON'T, BUT DEMOCRATS HAVE PROVEN WE'RE WILLING TO WORK WITH REPUBLICANS TO IMPROVE THE PROBLEMS THAT EXIST IN THIS LAW OR ANY OTHER LAW. MILLIONS OF AMERICANS ARE STRUGGLING TO FIND WORK TODAY AND WE KNOW THAT. OUR FIRST PRIORITY MUST BE TO IMPROVE THE ECONOMY. IT'S TIME, THOUGH, FOR REPUBLICANS TO STOP REFIGHTING YESTERDAY'S BATTLES. NOW THAT THIS MATTER IS SETTLED, LET'S MOVE ON TO OTHER THINGS, LIKE JOBS.</blockquote>

  • John Kline

    "The Supreme Court's decision is a devastating blow to the American people," said Rep. John Kline (R-Minn). "If Washington can punish private citizens for failing to buy government-approved health insurance, there is no reasonable limit on federal power. Through his health care law, the president has upset the careful balance between the people and their government. The vast majority of the public does not support this government takeover of health care, and Congress must continue its efforts to repeal it. ObamaCare continues to destroy jobs, raise health care costs, and weaken our economy. It was the wrong prescription for reform and it must be repealed. As I listen to families and small businesses in Minnesota and across the country, rising costs continues to be their top health care concern. President Obama should stop defending a fatally flawed scheme and start working with Republicans on step-by-step solutions that will expand access to more affordable health care.

  • Tom Smith

    "Today's unfortunate decision strengthens our resolve to defeat Senator Casey and President Obama in order to repeal and replace a disastrous law that has ballooned the debt, increased the cost of insurance and eroded freedoms," said Tom Smith, the Republican candidate in Pennsylvania for U.S. Senate. "Healthcare decisions should be made by doctors, patients and their families, not by government bureaucrats. In the Senate, I will fight to see ObamaCare repealed and replaced with commonsense free market reforms that reduce cost, increase access, and promote the quality and innovation that has made our healthcare system the envy of the world." "Sadly, as Pennsylvania families have suffered from stagnant unemployment and future generations have continued to be buried under record debt, Senator Casey and Barack Obama have prioritized defending a failed government takeover of healthcare. Americans deserve elected leaders who place the needs of their constituents over their own political agendas," Smith added.

  • Bob Kerrey

    "Now that the court spectacle is over its time for Republicans and Democrats to put partisan politics aside and get down to business to find true cost containment solutions before we bankrupt the country," said former senator Bob Kerrey, the Democratic contender for the US Senate seat in Nebraska. "I for one am confident I can work with Republicans to find common sense solutions that begin with establishing State based exchanges and supporting exciting initiatives by providers to lower costs and improve quality."

  • Raul Grijalva

    "This ruling is a significant victory for the American people. After a two-year legal battle, the Supreme Court confirmed today that the Affordable Care Act will continue to provide millions of Americans with health coverage," Reps. Ra?l M. Grijalva (D-AZ) and Keith Ellison (D-MN) of the Congressional Progressive Caucus said. "The health care reform act provides that children will not be denied coverage due to a preexisting condition, young adults will be able to stay on their family health plan, and that Americans can keep their health care insurance if they get a major illness. The Affordable Care Act will now take its rightful place with Social Security and Medicare as powerful examples of what we can do together to improve the lives of every American. "Despite today's victory, Republicans in Congress will continue their assault on universal health care for the American people. Throughout this year, GOP lawmakers have tried to repeal and cut back health care benefits, including Medicare and Medicaid. We must continue to work together to protect vital reforms that will improve the health of every American. "Today's decision is a turning point for the American people. Let's remember that millions of American families suffered without health care coverage for decades. The health care reform program has already benefited millions of families. The Court's decision to uphold reform proposed by President Obama and enacted by the Congress is a sign that dramatic change can happen when the American people demand change. We have made an important step forward toward our goal of affordable universal coverage. Now we need to be vigilant to implement the law so that American families have the health care they have needed for decades."

  • Steve King

    "This is a clash of two concepts of civilization," Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) told HuffPost's Greg Rosalsky. "This is the cultural Marxists lined up against the patriots. And the people that believe in limited government and the concept of classical federalism and the principles that were embodied in the Constitution; I can tell you not one of our founding fathers would agree with this decision today. Not one." King also released a statement: "Leading up to today, the lower courts were split on a handful of issues," said King. "One issue they were nearly unanimous on was that the individual mandate was not a tax therefore could not be upheld under Congress's power to tax. Today the Supreme Court disagrees with the vast majority of lower court decisions and contradicts President Obama himself, who vehemently denied that the individual mandate was a tax. The fate of ObamaCare is not yet set. The House has voted to pass my language to repeal 100% of ObamaCare. Every Republican Senator has voted to do the same. On the other hand, President Obama and Democrats in Congress remain as committed as ever to forcing the unconstitutional law that bears the President's name upon an unwilling and disapproving public. The choice could not be clearer. The American people should be reminded that there is no force more powerful than their voice. After the passage of ObamaCare, the American people made their disapproval known in a powerful way. Today's decision should renew that call and spirit. The Constitution lays out a government of limited, enumerated powers, and the size and scope of our current government, and specifically ObamaCare, are well beyond what our Founding Fathers ever intended. The American people will decide the fate of ObamaCare."

  • Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/05/mitt-romney-john-roberts-healthcare_n_1651302.html

    game of thrones season 2 wrestlemania 28 dierks bentley kenny chesney blake shelton academy of country music awards brad paisley